نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 Department of Chemistry Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of English Language Education, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Background and Objective: This study aimed to investigate the factors that influence effective chemistry teaching. The goal was to design and validate a proposed model of these factors. Methods: The study employed a mixed-methods approach (quantitative and qualitative). The qualitative part's target population included international documents similar to this study from 2010 to 2025, out of which approximately 27 studies were purposively selected. For the quantitative part, students enrolled in the chemistry department at Farhangian University in the 2021 academic year, across the country, participated in the study, with 129 respondents randomly selected to complete the questionnaire. The data for the qualitative section were collected through a systematic review of 27 relevant studies. This analysis provided the basis for the initial model design. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire based on qualitative results, and theoretical literature served as the data collection instrument. Experts and chemistry education professors confirmed the content validity; SmartPLS software was used for structural equation modeling to assess convergent and discriminant validity. Findings: Qualitative data highlighted various factors influencing effective chemistry teaching, including skill development in learners, management and supervision, improvements in educational environments and equipment, curriculum focus, participation and interaction, technology use, and the adoption of diverse teaching methods. Quantitative data verified the content validity of the questionnaire and its convergent and discriminant validity via Smart PLS, with reliability scores of Cronbach’s alpha at 0.892 and composite reliability at 0.912. Additionally, with an overall fit index (GOF = 0.461), the measurement model was deemed appropriate. Conclusion: The results indicate that the designed model effectively captures the key factors influencing effective chemistry teaching.
کلیدواژهها [English]
Abboudi, J. & Nazarpour, H. (2021). Study and investigation of factors affecting interest and motivation in second-year secondary school students in chemistry. Research in Chemistry Education, 2(4), 73-96. [In Persian]. https://chemedu.cfu.ac.ir/article_1645.html?lang=en
Abedi Kargiban, Z. (2013). Investigation of chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in Iranian high schools. World Applied Sciences Journal, 24(9), 1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.24.09.13104
Abudu, F., Ayoberd, S. A., & Marifa, H. A. (2024). Senior high school chemistry teachers’ knowledge and use of group work as a teaching strategy. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(2). em062. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14410
Achimugu, L. (2016). Principals’ instructional leadership qualities that enhance effective teaching and learning of chemistry in secondary schools from the perspectives of students and teachers. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(7), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.21275/v5i7.ART2016240
Adekunle, O., Olu, A. V., & Nwabuno, N. (2021). Teaching chemistry with computer simulation: Would senior school students perform better? Crawford Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 16-32. [Link]
Ahmad, Z., Ammar, M., Sellami, A., & Al-Thani, N. J. (2023). Effective pedagogical approaches used in high school chemistry education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(5), 1796-1810. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00739
Ahmadi, N., Taqvaee Yazdi, M., & Safarian Hamadani, S. (2024). Design and validation of the lesson study assessment tool. Journal of Educational Strategies in Medical Science, 17(5), 123–133. [In Persian]. http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-3177-en.html
Akrami, Z. (2024). The Principles of Needs Assessment in the Optimal Curriculum in Chemistry Education. Research in Chemistry Education, 6(3), 64-84. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.48310/chemedu.2024.16579.1243
AlMahdawi, M., Senghore, S., Ambrin, H., & Belbase, S. (2021). High school students’ performance indicators in distance learning in chemistry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(11), 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110672
Almeida, F. (2018). Strategies to perform a mixed methods study. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(1): 137–151. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1406214
Avwiri, E. H. (2011). Approaches for effective teaching of chemistry in Nigerian secondary schools. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 2(1), 236–240. https://icidr.org.ng/index.php/Jres/article/view/1165
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1, pp. 141–154). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2730439
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an Illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285–309. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2800017
Bhuttah, T. M., Xiaoduan, C., Ullah, H., & Javed, S. (2019). Analysis of curriculum development stages from the perspective of Tyler, Taba, and Wheeler. European Journal of Social Sciences, 58(1), 14–22. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3288762
Bicalho, R. N. D. M., Coll, C., Engel, A., & Lopes de Oliveira, M. C. S. (2023). Integration of ICTs in teaching practices: propositions to the SAMR model. Educational technology research and development, 71(2), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10169-x
Bugaje, B. M. (2013). Qualitative chemistry education: The role of the teacher. IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry, 4(5), 10-14. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jac/papers/Vol4-issue5/D0451014.pdf
Carlisle, D., Tyson, J., & Nieswandt, M. (2015). Fostering spatial skill acquisition by general chemistry students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(3), 478-517. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00228H
Chen, K., Lin, J., Wang, Z., Chen, K., & Yang, J. (2023). Teaching performance of chemistry teachers in the Chinese mainland during the COVID-19 pandemic: a content analysis study. Journal of chemical education, 100(4), 1466-1475. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00873
Cho, J., & Baek, W. (2019). Identifying factors affecting the quality of teaching in basic science education: Physics, biological sciences, mathematics, and chemistry. Sustainability, 11(14), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143958
Davari, A. & Rezazadeh, A. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with PLS Software. Tehran: Jihad Daneshgahi Publishing Organization.
Dayal, P. D., & Ali-Chand, Z. (2022). Effective teaching and learning strategies in a chemistry classroom. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 57(2), 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-022-00242-7
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Domenici, V., & Chiocca, G. (2024). Perception of chemistry and chemistry education: A case study and some reflections. Substantia, 8(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.36253/Substantia-2612
Dool, M. A., Mughal, S. H., & Rind, A. A. (2020). Usage of effective questioning to enhance students ‘level of participation in a grade XI chemistry classroom of a government degree college in the rural district of Jacobabad. License, 3(3), 222–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3-iss3-2020(222-231)
Eshkoraev, S. (2024). Revolutionizing education: Harnessing innovative technologies in teaching chemical technology. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology, 4(3), 69–81. https://mjstjournal.com/index.php/mjst/article/view/976
Folounrunso, B. E., & Sunday, A. O. (2017). Relative effectiveness of guided discovery and demonstration teaching techniques on performance in chemistry in senior secondary schools in ILE-IFE, Nigeria. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 663–678. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.999983
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
Green, M. L., & Parkin, G. (2014). Application of the covalent bond classification method for the teaching of inorganic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(6), 807–816. DOI:10.1021/ed400504f
Grushow, A., & Reeves, M. S. (2019). Using computational methods to teach chemical principles: overview. ACS Symposium Series, 1–10. DOI:10.1021/bk-2019-1312.ch001
Hartanto, H., Suherman, D., Warta, W., & Barlian, U. C. (2022). Learning system management to improve the quality of learning chemistry for students of State 8 SMA Negeri 8 Bekasi and Taman Students High School of Bekasi. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 3(5), 1927–1934. DOI:10.51601/ijersc.v3i5.428
Hassan, A. A., Ali, H. I., Salum, A. A., Kassim, A. M., Elmoge, Y. N., & Amour, A. A. (2015). Factors affecting students’ performance in chemistry: A case study in Zanzibar secondary schools. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 9(11), 4086–4093. file:///C:/Users/arash/Downloads/10006159.pdf
Iyamuremye, A., Mukiza, J., Nsabayezu, E., Ukobizaba, F., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2021). Web-based discussions in teaching and learning: Secondary school teachers’ and students’ perceptions and potential to enhance students’ performance in organic chemistry. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2695–2715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10725-7
Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based chemistry education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 251-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2248436
Kahovec, J. (2002). Scattering Methods for the Investigation of Polymers. In Macromolecular Symposia (Vol. 190). file:///C:/Users/arash/Downloads/10.1515_ci.2003.25.3.21a.pdf
Kerekes, J. (2024). The Impact of the Lack of Chemistry and Physics Laboratories in Schools. Educatia 21 Journal, 28, 333-341. https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2024.28.36
Khodaei, M., Askarian, F., Dehghan Ghahfarokhi, A., & Tayebi, B. (2023). A systematic review of the economic benefits of sport development. Applied Research of Sport Management, 12(1), 51–66. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.30473/arsm.2023.65848.3716
Kochkarova, R. R., & Turgunov, E. (2023). Improving the methodology of teaching chemistry lessons at school with the help of different games. American Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 3(10), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajast/Volume03Issue10-04
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for pedagogical improvement: Editorial for special issue on TPACK. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24, 459-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0241-6
Kousa, P. M., & Aksela, M. K. (2019). The needs for successful chemistry teaching in diverse classes: teachers' beliefs and practices. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 7(1), 79-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.7.1.390
Kousa, P., Kavonius, R., & Aksela, M. (2018). Low-achieving students’ attitudes towards learning chemistry and chemistry teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00226B
Malik, S., Rohendi, D., & Widiaty, I. (2019, February). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) with information and communication technology (ICT) integration: A literature review. In 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018) (pp. 498-503). https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.114
Mazid, H., Rachmalia, L., Suyanta, S., & Widjajanti, E. (2023). Teacher strategies in managing chemistry learning time to improve student learning achievement. Journal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 1129-1136. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5192
McBrayer, J. S., Akins, C., Gutierrez de Blume, A., Cleveland, R., & Pannell, S. (2020). Instructional Leadership Practices and School Leaders’ Self-efficacy. School Leadership Review, 15(1), 1-34. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. T. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Publishing.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mojsoska, B., Pande, P., Moeller, M. E., Ramasamy, P., & Jepsen, P. M. (2024). Virtual reality in an eco-niche undergraduate organic chemistry laboratory course: New practice in chemistry lab teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(11), 4686–4693. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00099
Mojtanazadeh, M. (2023). Designing and validating a tool to assess the curriculum quality of universities in Iran. Journal of Educational Strategies in Medical Science, 16(4), 323-334. [In Persian]. http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-2094-en.html
Monday, M., & Fashakin, O. (2024). Using lesson study as a tool to cope with instructional challenges: A case study of chemistry teachers in Nigeria. African Journal of Teacher Education, 13(2), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v13i2.8024
Musengimana, J., Kampire, E., & Ntawiha, P. (2021). Factors affecting secondary school students' attitudes toward learning chemistry: A Review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1). em1931. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9379
Mwangi, J. T., & Kibui, J. T. O. (2016). Effect of chemistry practicals on students' performance in Chemistry in public secondary schools of Machakos and Nairobi Counties in Kenya. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(8), 586-588. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20175884
Narzullayev, M., Xoliyorova, S., Pardayev, U., & Tilyabov, M. (2024). The method of organizing chemistry lessons using the case study method. Modern Science and Research, 3(5), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11120435
Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2023). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: A case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50-70. DOI: 10.1039/D2RP00110A
Pekdağ, B. (2010). Alternative methods in learning chemistry: Learning with animation, simulation, video, and multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 79-110. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/513?articlesBySimilarityPage=29
Polk, J. A. (2006). Traits of effective teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(4), 23-29. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3200/AEPR.107.4.23-29
Saadati, Masoud (2021). The need for rethinking in experimental science education again. Research in Chemistry Education, 2(4), 1-4. [In Persian]. file:///C:/Users/arash/Downloads/10009513990401.pdf
Shukla, Y. (2024). Innovative methods of using practical experiments in teaching chemistry. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Arts, Science and Technology, 2(2), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.61778/ijmrast.v2i2.38
Sattarifar, A., Ghahremani, J. & Tahmasbzadeh Sheikhlar, D. (2023). Design and validation of the optimal model of chemistry curriculum with IBSE approach. Journal of Educational Strategies in Medical Sciences, 16(6), 519-530. [In Persian]. http://edcbmj.ir/article-1-2992-en.html
Schweiker, S., & Levonis, S. (2023). Enhancing chemistry education through technology-enhanced learning: impact on student outcomes. ASCILITE Publications. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.463.
Sembiring, D. A. K., & Tijow, M. A. (2025). The relevance and impact of academic supervision on educational excellence in secondary schools. Journal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 10(1), 260-274. DOI: 10.31851/jmksp.v10i1.16860
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers' professional development. English language teaching, 3(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237
Shiddiqi, M. H. A., Arthamena, V. D., Ayyubi, M., Manarisip, A. J., & Aznam, N. (2024). Systematic literature review: Analysis of misconception problems and diagnostic instruments for learning chemistry. Journal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.5189
Shin, N., Choi, S. Y., Stevens, S. Y., & Krajcik, J. S. (2019). The impact of using a coherent curriculum on students’ understanding of core ideas in chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9861-z
Shuhrat qizi, R. S. (2024). Use of interactive methods in chemistry. International Bulletin of Medical Sciences and Clinical Research, 2(8), 115-119. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10032381
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. American Educational Research Association, 15(2), 4-14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175860
Simesso, M. D., Gutu, T. S., & Tarekegn, W. M. (2024). The contribution of using cooperative learning methods to students’ achievement and retention in secondary schools during chemistry lessons. Education Research International, 2024(1), 1830124. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1830124
Song, Q., Li, M., Zhang, Z., & Zhou, Q. (2025). Learning effectiveness of virtual technologies in chemistry using a three-level meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 14737–14759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13321-1
Sözbilir, M., Pınarbaşı, T., & Canpolat, N. (2010). Prospective chemistry teachers’ conceptions of chemical thermodynamics and kinetics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75232
Subedi, R. R. (2021). Constructivist Approach in Learning Chemistry: A Case of High School in Nepal. Interdisciplinary Research in Education, 6(2), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.3126/ire.v6i2.43535
Sugano, S. G., Nabua, E., Barquilla, M., Buan, A., & Inutan, E. D. (2019). Meta-analytic review of studies on the effectiveness of chemistry teaching methods on student transformation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340, 012082. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012082
Tsadik Getu, G., Kidan Mebrahitu, G., & Yohannes, G. (2024). Effects of context-based teaching chemistry on students' achievement: A systematic review. Journal Pijar Mipa, 19(2), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i2.6458
Vallespin, M. R. D., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of learning cycle models and online teaching strategies in chemistry education. International Journal of Instruction, 17(2), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17219a
Wetzels, M., Odekerken, S. G., & Vanoppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: an empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
Widarti, H. R., Sriwahyuni, T., Rokhim, D. A., & Syafruddin, A. B. (2023). Social media-based learning in Chemistry learning: A review. Eclética Química, 48(2), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.26850/1678-4618eqj.v48.2.2023.p17-21
Woldeamanuel, M., Atagana, H., & Engida, T. (2014). What makes chemistry difficult? African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(2), 31–43. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajce/article/view/104070
Xoliyorova, S., Tilyabov, M., & Pardayev, U. (2024). Explaning the basic concepts of chemistry to 7th-grade students in general schools based on STEAM. Modern Science and Research, 3(2), 362-365. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10966929
Zarei, E., & Hossein Nia, R. (2023). Analysis of high school chemistry textbooks used in Iran for representations of the nature of science. Interchange, 54(2), 253–270. DOI: 10.1007/s10780-023-09490-y
Zheng, C., Fu, L., & He, P. (2014). Development of an instrument for assessing the effectiveness of chemistry classroom teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9459-3
Zhong, G. (2011). Reformation and practice on the curriculum system and teaching model of coordination chemistry for postgraduates. Advances in Computer Science, Environment, Ecoinformatics, and Education, August 21-22, 2011. Proceedings, Part V (pp. 26–31). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23357-9_6
Zhu, Y., Zhao, Y., Yao, R., Song, W., & He, Z. (2024). Practice and exploration of diversified teaching modes in organic chemistry. Curriculum Learning and Exploration, 2(2), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.18686/cle.v2i2.3818
)